Wink is determined to show that you can critique penal substitution without being a neo-liberal. He accepts the punishment bit unlike most neo-liberals but denies substitution. I will interact with this more later- in the meantime any one else up for the debate with him?

• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke Confirms He Does Not Believe in Penal Substitution
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke’s Further Arguments Against Penal Substitution
• Schreiner on penal substitution
• Does penal substitution contribute to oppression?
• Defining Penal Substitution
• The Atonement – Packer on Penal Substitution
• Penal substitution defended against the attacks of neo-liberals
• The Atonement – Is Penal Substitution the Only Thing That Happened at the Cross?
• The implications of denying the simple gospel of penal substitution
• The simple gospel of penal substitution according to Paul
• The Atonement – An Attack on Penal Substitution
• New perspectives on Paul and penal substitution- more audio
• Penal substitution explained by John Piper
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke Argues Against Penal Substitutionary Atonement
• Surely the neo-liberals can do better than this?