Wink has made an attempt at Parableman: Defining Penal Substitution following on from which he intends to show why he believes it is inaccurate.

• Critiquing Penal Substitution
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke Confirms He Does Not Believe in Penal Substitution
• Schreiner on penal substitution
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke’s Further Arguments Against Penal Substitution
• The implications of denying the simple gospel of penal substitution
• The simple gospel of penal substitution according to Paul
• The Atonement – Is Penal Substitution the Only Thing That Happened at the Cross?
• The Atonement – Packer on Penal Substitution
• Does penal substitution contribute to oppression?
• Penal substitution defended against the attacks of neo-liberals
• The Atonement – An Attack on Penal Substitution
• Penal substitution explained by John Piper
• New perspectives on Paul and penal substitution- more audio
• The Atonement – Romans 1-3 and Penal Substitutionary Atonement
• The gospel in one passage- penal substution clearly defined