UPDATE November 2008- Steve Chalke has expressed his views more fully in a chapter in The Atonement Debate, and I have posted a response to this.

Leaving Munster was disappointed but does a good job of describing the public EA debate on Steve Chalke from his perspective- I hadnt seen this before today: “It was enjoyable but, ultimately, a little disappointing. The really disappointing thing, from my perspective, was that the responses againt Steve weren’t good enough. That’s my own subjective opinion of course, but I was really looking forward to hearing some knowledgable well thought-out defenses of penal substitution (which Steve denies) and Kingdom-centred discipleship-ethic which he promotes.”

• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke’s Further Arguments Against Penal Substitution
• 2008 Top Posts Numbers 5 and 6
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke Argues Against Penal Substitutionary Atonement
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke Confirms He Does Not Believe in Penal Substitution
• Cosmic child abuse
• Joel Edwards of the Evangelical Alliance comments further on the Steve Chalke debate
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke and Neglect of the Resurrection
• Update on Steve Chalke and The Atonement Debate
• Newday Report From Adrian’s Daughter
• TRAVEL DIARY – Meeting the JollyBlogger
• A Meeting in Milwaukee
• Rathergate report is out
• Jubilee Prayer Meeting – A visitor’s view
• Bible proved true in shock report!
• Pierced for Our Transgressions – The Atonement Revisited