“Adrian,

I took up your challenge and listened to your sermon this morning. I’d have to say that it has been some time since I last spent a Sunday morning that way.

First off, I’d have to say that you are an excellent speaker. Growing up Catholic, I was used to the notoriously horrible sermons that the Catholic clergy are known for. Not horrible in a fire & brimstone way, but horrible in just how boring, unfocused, rambling, repetititive and uninspired they were. You certainly put them all to shame, as well as any of the TV ministers I have ever listened to.

I took good notes, and will post a detailed review on the Daily Duck soon.”

• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke Argues Against Penal Substitutionary Atonement
• Update on Steve Chalke and The Atonement Debate
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke’s Further Arguments Against Penal Substitution
• The Atonement – N. T. Wright Attacks Both Sides of the Debate
• Wrath and the atonement- the debate continues
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke and Neglect of the Resurrection
• THE ATONEMENT DEBATE – Steve Chalke Confirms He Does Not Believe in Penal Substitution
• 11th Most Read Post – The Atonement: Wright Attacks Both Sides of the Debate
• Pray for your preachers. Pray for the lost
• The Evangelical Alliance speaks up- were they prompted by bloggers?
• How to pray
• The Atonement – A Quiz
• The Atonement – Romans 4-5 on Penal Substitutionary Atonement
• The Atonement – Penal Substitutionary Atonement Defined
• The Atonement – Romans 6-7 and Penal Substitutionary Atonement