Adrian Warnock adrianwarnock.com


More Headlines From This Blog Thursday, April 26, 2007

The Atonement - Penal Substitutionary Atonement Defined


In the previous post in this series we asked the question, “If Jesus was not a sinner, why did He die?" It’s now time that I shared my own definition of Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) which I wrote for a talk I gave last autumn. I thought I would also share the definition given by the authors of the new book, Pierced For Our Transgressions (PFOT). Wherever you are in the world, you can buy PFOT at 20% off the list price from The Good Book Company. That book, incidentally, is in my view essential reading for those aware of this debate, especially if you have already read C. J. Mahaney’s smaller, more devotional book called Living the Cross Centered Life.

I define PSA as follows:

Jesus died to take our punishment or penalty (i.e. penal), to substitute Himself (i.e. to take our place), and thereby to destroy sin and to turn away the wrath of God. This remedy is applied only to those who are “in Christ” — a union brought about through faith.

Christ needed to “become sin” so He could justly be punished for sin. Why was that necessary? Because it was the only way that God could be right to let us off the hook.

We can only be saved because the wrath of God has been removed, which means that the following is true:
  • It is only possible for God to forgive and lay aside his anger against us because he has punished sin in Christ.

  • He can only accept us because He actively rejected Christ on the cross.

  • Where the wages of sin is death, God arranged for Christ to pay the bill.

  • We are saved by Christ from the wrath of God.
“Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God.” (Romans 5:9)

You can hear that definition in context by downloading the audio (you may need to right click and save it to your PC) of my talk on the atonement or listening to it here:


The authors of PFOT have a similar definition that in many ways complements my own:
“The Doctrine of penal substitution teaches that God gave himself in the person of his Son to suffer instead of us the death, punishment and curse due to fallen humanity as the penalty for sin . . . the Lord Jesus Christ died for us — a shameful death, bearing our curse, enduring our pain, suffering the wrath of his own Father in our place.”
I am very happy to endorse these definitions, and believe them wholeheartedly. What about you?

Continues with "The Atonement - Romans 1-3 and Penal Substitutionary Atonement"

Labels:


Back to adrian warnock's blog or visit the archive pages April 2003  May 2003  June 2003  July 2003  August 2003  September 2003  October 2003  November 2003  December 2003  January 2004  February 2004  March 2004  April 2004  May 2004  June 2004  July 2004  August 2004  September 2004  October 2004  November 2004  December 2004  January 2005  February 2005  March 2005  April 2005  May 2005  June 2005  July 2005  August 2005  September 2005  October 2005  November 2005  December 2005  January 2006  February 2006  March 2006  April 2006  May 2006  June 2006  July 2006  August 2006  September 2006  October 2006  November 2006  December 2006  January 2007  February 2007  March 2007  April 2007  May 2007  June 2007  July 2007  August 2007  September 2007  October 2007  November 2007  December 2007 
25% off Logos Scholar's Library!
Logos Bible Software
Add to Google Reader / Homepage

Subscribe via RSS feed or enter your email address here:

View blog top tags


More books

ADRIAN'S LINKS

In partnership with the Jollyblogger

WARNIE AWARD WINNERS

Reformed Charismatic Blogs

Other Links


by Tim Challies

Pre-order now and get it signed!



YOUR ADVERT HERE..


MY INTERVIEWS